Latest News:

  • Linked In
  • twitter

Mitchell Phoenix BlogRSS

New Case Study: Leadership Development with Alderley Dubai

Mitchell Phoenix - Monday, October 31, 2011


In 2010 - 11 Mitchell Phoenix have been working closely with Alderley Dubai, running bespoke in-house programs for senior and fast track managers both in the UK and Dubai. 




"Alderley has undergone a program of substantial organizational change as part of its growth strategy in an increasingly complex and competitive marketplace. Central to that change is its human resources as Alderley recognizes that the quality and attitude of its people directly impacts on the customer experience and the bottom line. The Mitchell Phoenix Governing Change Program was a key element of our development process that has equipped our management team with new leadership and organizational skills as well as a common operating framework that has made a significant contribution to our success and optimism for the future.  Without exception, all participants feel more confident, able and effective as a consequence of the Program." 

Nick Hull, Managing Director, Alderley Dubai


“The management team of Alderley Dubai were especially rewarding to work with. Their enthusiasm, diligence and application of ideas created the results that Nick and the senior team envisaged. In addition they made use of all the available strategies in Mitchell Phoenix projects, supporting each other, building team results and spurring each other on to deliver the maximum - a great group of people!” 
Kevin Yates, Managing Director, Mitchell Phoenix


Click here to read the case study


Why Companies in High Growth Use Mitchell Phoenix

Mitchell Phoenix - Monday, September 05, 2011

In discussion with a client the other day, he remarked on how many of Mitchell Phoenix's long-standing relationships are with companies in high growth; some of which have become household names during the 20 years we have been doing business with them. What is it about our approach and the results we create that suits organizations experiencing rapid change so well? Here is the answer.... click to read on

The 10 Most Common Pitfalls in Running a Business

Mitchell Phoenix - Wednesday, June 01, 2011

If you are searching for factors that separate successful businesses from the herd, sooner or later you will seek out a meeting with a business transformation specialist. Business transformation specialists make their career in exactly that: they arrive at companies which are performing sub-optimally, and guide those businesses to greater profit and achievement. For organizations which are experiencing difficulties, transformation specialists are ambulance, fire service, analyst, strategist, psychologist and motivator, all rolled into one.

When Ross Stuart arrives at an assignment, what does he usually find? “Almost all of the problems I find in one business I will have seen before on other assignments,” says Ross, “in fact the pitfalls management fall into are the same both within and across industry sectors.”

Here are the ten management pitfalls Ross encounters most often: 

The Ten Most Common Pitfalls in Running a Business

  1. Ineffectual, poorly trained senior management
  2. Lack of leadership and robust governance: no clear direction and support from the top
  3. Senior management in denial
  4. Poor quality
  5. Narrow customer base
  6. Poor financial systems
  7. Poor communication with the employees
  8. Poor stock control
  9. Little or no marketing expertise, a depleted and demotivated sales force
  10. High overheads
Ross encounters these pitfalls so often that he has written an ebook detailing how he detects and deals with these issues, and what you can do to deal with them in your business. Click here to request a free copy of the ebook.



There is no Planet B – We need some Action Heroes

Mitchell Phoenix - Monday, April 18, 2011


In September last year James Donnelly, President of Mitchell Phoenix USA, attended BizClimate 2010. In an article which first appeared in Mitchell Phoenix's Autumn Newsletter, he summarizes his thoughts on the event, and what will be required of managers in the future.

Leading is no longer enough.


I attended BizClimate 2010 last week, part of a series of conferences taking place at New York Climate Week headlined by the Bill Clinton Initiative (only $30,000 a ticket). Climate Week revolved around the opportunities for business in investment, cost saving and the creation of climate wealth.

BizClimate 2010 used Moore’s Law of Sustainability as a vision for the way in which business would drive the carbon economy in the future. Gordon Moore was a founder of Intel and changed the face of the technology world when he predicted that the density of semi-conductors on a chip would double every year.

By setting this expectation, it drove investment leading to innovation. In the same way the conference set out to explore the potential in exponential growth of green energy management and solutions.

The core themes explored by expert panels were Innovation, Investment, Expectation and Leadership. What was reinforced over the course of the event was a consensus that action was needed, that governments were loath to take the lead and that any advancement towards a ‘better world’ lay in the hands of business leaders.

We are at the start of a pioneering age with potentially greater significance than the industrial revolution. There are fortunes to be made. So what’s holding it up?

There is no measurement. No price on carbon, no visibility on regulation, no obvious clean energy horse to bet on. Perceived risk is the barrier. Everyone is waiting for someone to break from the pack. We don’t want the dot.energy race to become another dot.com farrago.

It takes courage to decide on a new course of action. It takes strength to stand your ground and deliver change. It requires inner conviction and determination to succeed against the status quo. The world needs leaders who believe in a cause, who can communicate a vision and inspire others to great heights.  We need action heroes.

What is the difference between an action hero and a leader? I think, today, ‘manager’ is the new leader and leader has now become ‘action hero’. It is no longer enough to lead.

Generating new action is the route to change, learning and growth. The term ‘leader’ has lost connection with urgency, decisiveness and a link with future security and prosperity. When you see an action hero you are reminded of what is important. They are a walking billboard for direction and purpose, immediately inspiring a sense of confidence, energizing those around them.

Inertia is the enemy, generated by habit, fear and greed. Time for Sir Isaac Newton’s Laws of Motion! Action orientation is a commitment to change and a commitment to the future that generates results, produces measurement and reinforces progress that is being made.

Sustainability, climate wealth, green energy, carbon markets will figure large in all our futures. Leaders are not doing enough. There is no Planet B. Where are the action heroes?


Who should Sponsor a Leadership Development Project?

Mitchell Phoenix - Tuesday, April 12, 2011


Mitchell Phoenix' Managing Director Kevin Yates recently published the ebook, 
How to Build a Successful Leadership Development Project in which he outlines the central factors required if a leadership program is to yield real return on investment. In this extract, he explores who the sponsor of the project should be...



It is quite likely that an incoming senior executive has identified the opportunity for an improvement in the leadership skills of the management group. This may be a promoted MD, CEO or someone brought in with recent experience of greater leadership capability in another organisation (competitor perhaps?) This sponsorship is the best possible start point for gathering support from the board and will be a natural step to engage the wider management population. 

Three levels of management need to be converted for the culture change to take effect.  This means CEO, board and senior operational management.  In a large organisation you will also need to engage the best of the next tier down to make it complete and secure.  After that, leadership by example and sweeping demand for better practice will permeate the business.  In the longer term, standards of behaviour have to be rigorously applied and defended.  (This latter effect will be determined by the quality of leadership thinking delivered by the development project itself).

What happens when only HR or a more junior group have identified the need? Clearly we have to build more support into the senior operational areas and the CEO has to be sold on this need.  By highlighting concrete examples of sub-optimal behaviour; raising questions about succession, ownership of goals, poor meeting management, and crisis culture we can lay the groundwork for a decision to be made.  In addition, issues of falling standards of recruitment and greater attrition can be flagged.  Lack of choice and quality in promotions and honest performance review will further bring the messages home.  Leadership profiling tools can be brought to bear to display, empirically, the opportunities for personal growth.

There has to be acceptance of this need at the highest levels.  Ready & Conger, in their analysis of why leadership development projects fail, identify lack of ownership as the principle pathology.  Their solution, everyone should own it, is long on good advice but short on how to achieve it. In this article, I discuss the 5 steps necessary to build a successful leadership development project (click to read).


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive